Public comment begins Sept. 1 on the
proposed Lake Davis Pike Eradication project’s joint draft environmental
review document, according to the California Department of Fish and Game
(DFG). Four public hearings have been scheduled that will take place in
September and October. The comment period is scheduled to run for 45
days, from Sept. 1 to Oct. 16.The public may provide verbal and
written comment at the hearings scheduled on
Tuesday, Sept. 26, 2006 – Two sessions, 1 to 4 p.m. and
6 to 9 p.m., Portola Station Baptist Church, 171 S. Gulling Street,
Portola; and Thursday, Oct. 5, 2006 – Two sessions, 1
to 4 p.m., and 6 to 9 p.m., National University, Room 120, 9320 Tech
Center Dr., Sacramento. Written comments may also be submitted by e-mail
by going to the Web site at
www.dfg.ca.gov/northernpike, or by fax, hand-delivery, or U.S. mail.
Verbal comments, in addition to the hearings, may be submitted to the
U.S. Forest Service, Plumas National Forest (PNF) by appointment. Call
(530) 283-7761 to make an appointment.
The Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
(EIR/EIS) was prepared by Entrix, Inc. for DFG and the PNF, for the
proposed project. The Draft EIR/EIS addresses the potential
environmental effects that could result from the proposed project, as
well as proposed project alternatives. An Initial Study was prepared and
distributed in September 2005.
The Draft EIR/EIS and supporting documents are available on the DFG
Web site at
www.dfg.ca.gov/northernpike and upon request at (916) 445-3584.
Copies of the Draft EIR/EIS are available to review at the following
locations:
DFG, 4001 N. Wilson Way, Stockton
DFG, 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A, Rancho Cordova
DFG, 1416 9th St., 1st Floor, Office of Communications, Sacramento
Plumas National Forest, Beckwourth Ranger District, 23 Mohawk Road,
Blairsden
Plumas National Forest, 159 Lawrence St., Quincy
Sacramento Public Library, 828 I St., Sacramento
Plumas County Library, 445 Jackson St., Quincy,
Plumas County Library Portola Branch, 34 Third Ave., Portola
Portola City Hall, 35 Third Ave., Portola
With the release of the Draft EIR/EIS on Sept. 1, 2006, a 45-day
comment period will begin, ending at 5 p.m. on Oct. 16, 2006. Comments
must be postmarked or received by Oct. 16. Please mail, FAX, or hand
deliver written comments to DFG and PNF at:
Lake Davis Pike Eradication Project
Department of Fish and Game
1812 9th St., Attention: Ed Pert
Sacramento, CA 95814
FAX: (916) 445-4044
Lake Davis, the only body of water in California where pike are known
to exist, is a State Water Project reservoir located within Plumas
County and the PNF, approximately six miles upstream of the confluence
of Big Grizzly Creek with the Middle Fork Feather River, and five miles
north of the town of Portola on State Highway 70. Lake Davis drains into
the Middle Fork Feather River, which ends at Lake Oroville. From Lake
Oroville, water flows into the Feather River, then into the Sacramento
River, and then into the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The project area
comprises the area directly affected by the project alternatives,
including treatment and neutralization activities.
The DFG proposes to eradicate pike from Lake Davis and its
tributaries to re-establish the trout fishery at Lake Davis and to
prevent the pike from escaping from the reservoir and causing ecological
impacts in other parts of the state. The primary goal of the project is
complete eradication of pike from Lake Davis and its tributaries. The
project would be approved and implemented by the DFG. The PNF action for
the project is the issuance of a special use permit to the DFG and
potentially two forest closure orders.
Seven project alternatives are evaluated in the Draft EIR/EIS,
including the Proposed Project/Proposed Action, which involves the draw
down of Lake Davis to approximately 15,000 acre-feet and the application
of liquid rotenone to the reservoir and its tributaries. One alternative
would use powdered rotenone only to treat the reservoir at this same
volume. Three other alternatives also involve liquid rotenone treatment
of Lake Davis and its tributaries, utilizing varying degrees of a lake
drawdown One alternative is a non-chemical alternative, involving the
complete dewatering of the reservoir and its tributaries, and there is
also a No Project/No Action alternative. In addition, the document
analyzes four options for neutralization of treated water in Lake Davis,
which could be discharged into Big Grizzly Creek.
The document evaluates the impact all the alternatives could have on
physical, biological, human and environmental resources. DFG hopes to
decide on whether or not to implement a project in January 2007.
###