|
* * * IMPORTANT NOTICE * * *
You are currently viewing the old OUTDOOR CENTRAL.COM website ARCHIVES. For the latest in hunting, fishing, and outdoor recreation
related news, and an ALL NEW experience, including user friendly navigation,
search capabilities, an Outdoor Central Video Network, and more, be sure to
visit our NEW WEBSITE, located at
http://www.outdoorcentral.com. Visit the new, improved
website, you'll be glad you did! CLICK
HERE
|
|
|
KDWP DEER TASK FORCE REPORTS TO LEGISLATURE
Group requests public input before final deer recommendations are made
TOPEKA -- The Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks (KDWP) presented a
report on deer-related statute review to the Kansas Legislature Feb. 1 and
2. During the legislature’s 2005 session, the House Wildlife, Parks, and
Tourism Committee requested that the department review statutes and bring
recommendations to simplify them. Last fall, the Deer Task Force
Committee, a 10-member group of department employees, was assembled to
begin that process. The Task Force began meeting in November, charged
with reviewing not only deer-related statutes, but also regulations,
permitting processes, and management. The group soon discovered that it
couldn’t change one aspect of the package without affecting two or three
other areas. And it realized that with potential changes affecting so many
hunters, landowners, and nonhunters, public input was necessary.
The Deer Task Force’s report to the legislature highlighted important
issues and preliminary recommendations, but it requested that any final
department recommendations for changes to deer-related statutes be delayed
until the 2007 legislative session. The group has already begun receiving
public input and plans to solicit more input before final recommendations
are written.
Key issues which guided task force efforts include the following:
 | Permit allocation and distribution should be a function of the
Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, and opportunity to obtain
permits should be fair and equitable. |
 | Comments from hunters, landowners, and outfitters indicate an
overwhelming dislike for the current transferable permit system. |
 | The deer resource, especially mule deer in the west, must be
conserved. Deer populations should be maintained within levels
sustainable by the habitat and within tolerance levels of people for the
damages and conflicts that deer may cause. Animal health issues must be
addressed as they pertain to wild deer and captive cervid operations.
Deer herd characteristics must be maintained within aesthetic and
quality standards desired by people. |
 | Kansas’ deer hunting tradition must grow. The complexity and
restriction of current permitting procedures and regulations have kept
the Kansas deer hunting tradition from being what it could be. |
 | Stakeholder input is necessary. |
 | The permitting process and hunting regulations can be simplified.
|
 | Deer hunting opportunities can be improved. |
Preliminary recommendations generated by the task force include the
following:
 | Based on nonresident permit demand, it appears that unlimited
Whitetail Either Sex firearms permits could be provided with minimal
impact in eastern Kansas. If demand can be met for nonresident Whitetail
Either Sex permits, transferable permits will be unnecessary. The
current system forces landowners to depend on the luck of the draw, not
knowing if they or their hunters will have permits. Outfitters must
recruit landowners to apply for transferable nonresident permits, hoping
to draw enough permits for their clients. And in some units, a secondary
market has been created where permits may sell for thousands of dollars.
|
 | In western Kansas, where the resource is more limited, the task
force favors a cap of 25 percent of firearms Whitetail Either Sex
permits sold to residents the previous year made available to
nonresidents. The recommendation is to issue them on a first-come,
first-served basis. |
 | To simplify the permit process and provide better hunting
opportunities, the task force recommends reducing the number of deer
management units for Whitetail Either Sex permits from 19 to two -- an
East Unit and a West Unit. This would make the process of applying for a
permit easier and give hunters more freedom to explore new hunting
areas. The current 19 DMUs would be retained for the distribution of
whitetail antlerless permits and special harvest considerations. |
 | Another way to simplify permits and provide more hunting opportunity
is to establish a Whitetail Either Sex Any Season permit. This permit
would allow the holder to hunt anywhere in either the east or west unit,
during any season with the legal equipment. This has been a common
request from hunters in recent years. |
 | Re-establish a statewide Any-Deer (either species, either sex)
Archery permit. This would be unlimited to residents and a cap of up to
25 percent of what was sold to residents the previous year would be
available to nonresidents. |
 | Establish two units for Any-Deer (either species, either sex)
firearms and muzzleloader permits in western Kansas. These permits,
which allow mule deer harvest, are available in limited numbers to
residents. The task force recommends making a percentage of these
permits available to nonresidents. |
 | Allow members of a landowner’s immediate family to qualify for
Hunt-Own-Land permits, regardless of their residence. Currently, all
members of the immediate family residing in the home qualify, as long as
at least 80 acres is owned for each family member purchasing a
Hunt-Own-Land permit. Hunt-Own-Land permits may be transferred to lineal
or collateral relatives, and about 900 of the 10,000 Hunt-Own-Land
permits issued each year are transferred. However, law enforcement staff
reports that it is nearly impossible to verify blood and collateral
relatives. This change would be proposed to replace the transferable
Hunt-Own-Land permit. It would allow a landowner/tenant’s children or
parents to qualify for a hunt-own-land permit, whether they lived in the
home or not, even if they were nonresidents. The task force also
recommends that the definition of a landowner/tenant be strengthened to
include examples of proof and a clause stating that when applicants sign
the permit they agree to provide such proof on request. |
 | In an attempt to make deer hunting more attractive to young hunters,
the committee recommends half-price youth permits. This regulatory
change was presented to the Kansas Wildlife and Parks Commission in
January to consider for implementation during the 2006 season. |
 | Another recommendation that addresses quality hunting opportunities
is moving the muzzleloader season opener later. The special muzzleloader
season has traditionally opened in early September (the 2006 season is
proposed for Sept. 9-Sept. 22). Muzzleloader deer hunters have asked for
a later opening day because hot weather, likely during the current date
structure, makes the season unattractive. The task force proposes
opening the deer seasons with a youth season the last Friday, Saturday,
and Sunday in September. This special season was established for hunters
16 and younger to hunt with adult supervision, as well as hunters with
disabilities. It was specifically scheduled for September to avoid
extreme and cold weather. Currently the archery season opens on Oct. 1.
The committee recommends a concurrent opener for archery and
muzzleloader hunters on the Monday following the youth and disabled
hunters season. The muzzleloader season would continue for two weeks.
The archery season would continue until December 31 as it currently
does. |
 | To maintain balanced age structure and quality deer, the task force
recommends retaining the current one buck per hunter limit. It also
favors keeping the current firearms season dates, which are after the
peak of the deer breeding season. |
To view the complete report or comment on the recommendations listed
above, visit the KDWP
website .
The Task Force will schedule public meetings across the state later this
summer. A complete listing of these meetings will be posted on the
department’s website as soon as they are final. Public input and
discussion will also be accepted on the KDWP
blog .
-30-
Click Here To Return To The Previous Page
|